The first limitation is not necessarily a methodological flaw, as long as we draw a sharp line between initial attraction and longer-term attraction/romantic love. We are often very bad judges of our own personality and the traits we want others to possess. Being in an unusual or arousing environment can spark passion, even if the environment is perceived as dangerous or spooky (Dutton & Aron, 1974). Initial impressions don't really take personality into account, they are much more geared towards appearance Personality doesn't really start to come into play until people get to know each other a lot more and yeah those subsequent meeting happen much more rarely if initial attraction isn't present ...This limitation could have been avoided to some extent by using more sophisticated measures of personality and partner preference; for instance, by relying on third-person perspectives from family members, co-workers, and friends. The potential union satisfying general social norms, and acceptance of the potential union within one’s social network, can contribute to people falling in love. If a person can fulfill needs for companionship, love, sex, or mating, there is a greater chance that the other person will fall in love with him or her. basically what you said about the speed dating study Solid list of long-term indicators though!If this scenario sounds familiar, that's no coincidence: Many online dating sites provide at least some primitive version of the above scenario.
The truths about dating and mating
People do, occasionally, find love using online dating services.
However, the success of such services is unlikely to be a result of algorithms calculating who will be a good match for each other based on self-reports.
Discover Friendlier Foreign Women, Authentic People and Saner Cultures, Lower Cost Living, Healthier Food, Greater Freedoms and More! If you've ever wondered why: - You seldom see couples of Asian men and White women, and why such pairings are so rare.
- Asian men seem to be uncomfortable around white women (particularly American or Canadian but less so with European) as though they were an alien species which made them feel insecure about their masculinity.
In his book, “Dataclysm,” he points out that who we want to be and who we really are can be two very different things.
Data reveals truths that we might not want to say out loud.
The study methodology had well-known limitations: It only allowed for testing of initial attraction, not an attraction that may emerge from repeated encounters. The more you want to be in a relationship, the lower your self-esteem and the more likely you are to fall in love. While it may be possible for modern technology to determine partner matches by relying not just on personality, but also on people's particular circumstances, no such algorithm can provide us with the skills necessary to maintain a relationship that is both healthy and exciting.
Further, it followed the existing online dating strategy of relying on self-reports to determine personality and the traits one would like to see manifested in a potential partner. A particular feature of the other may spark a particularly strong attraction; for instance, parts of their body or facial features. These types of relationship skills may need to be acquired through long-term practice and training.
Here are 11 features that together provide a decent indicator of who you will click with over the long term (Aron, et al.